<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:id="m228">
    <teiHeader>
        <fileDesc>
            <titleStmt>
                <title>Thomas Becket, letter to W. Strahan and W. Rose, 25th December 1759</title>
                <author>
                    <persName>Becket, Thomas</persName>
                </author>
                <sponsor>University of Edinburgh</sponsor>
                <funder>Arts and Humanities Research Council</funder>
                <principal>Dr. Adam Budd</principal>
            </titleStmt>
            <publicationStmt>
                <publisher>The University of Edinburgh and the Arts &amp; Humanities Research Council</publisher>
                <availability>
                    <licence target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/">CC BY-SA</licence>
                    <p>&#169; University of Edinburgh and the Arts &amp; Humanities Research Council</p>
                </availability>
            </publicationStmt>
            <notesStmt>
                <note type="theme" subtype="pab">Partners and booksellers</note>
            </notesStmt>
            <sourceDesc>
                <msDesc>
                    <msIdentifier>
                        <idno>BL Osb. MSS. File 19546</idno>
                    </msIdentifier>
                    <history>
                        <p>Becket’s letter gives a fascinating insight into how an ambitious young bookseller might try to launch his own business in London—as Millar had done some thirty-five years before.</p>
                    </history>
                </msDesc>
            </sourceDesc>
        </fileDesc>
        <encodingDesc>
            <appInfo>
                <application ident="TEI_fromDOCX" version="2.15.0">
                    <label>DOCX to TEI</label>
                </application>
            </appInfo>
        </encodingDesc>
        <!--<revisionDesc>
            <listChange>
                <change><date>2014-09-29T22:33:07Z</date><name>hss support</name></change>
            </listChange>
        </revisionDesc>-->
    </teiHeader>
    <text>
        <body>
            <pb n="1" facs="scans/228/228a.jpg"/>
            <p>25 December 1759</p>
            <p><rs type="person" key="ptb">T. Becket</rs> returns his sincere thanks to <rs type="person" key="pws">M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Strahan</rs> &amp; <rs type="person" key="pwr">M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Rose</rs><note resp="pi" place="end" xml:id="ftn1" n="1"><p> William Strahan (1715–85), eminent printer and Millar’s longtime friend and business partner. Between 1740–65 Strahan moved his London premises four times in the area between St Bride’s and the Strand. By 1770 he owned the biggest printing operation in the kingdom, comprising three separate printing businesses in six buildings. William Rose (c.1718–86) was co-founder of the <hi rend="italic">Monthly Review </hi>(the leading literary review of the period, which was printed by Strahan). Rose was also one of Millar’s advisors on incoming manuscripts. All three men were born and educated in Scotland but pursued their careers in London.</p></note> for their very kind and friendly advice, and for the trouble they have been at in regard to his affairs.<note resp="pi" place="end" xml:id="ftn2" n="2"><p> Becket indented his letter, possibly in anticipation of annotations. </p></note> He has considered of <rs type="person" key="pam">M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Millar</rs>’s proposal, and, tho late,<note resp="pi" place="end" xml:id="ftn3" n="3"><p> <hi rend="italic">tho late</hi>, i.e., although Millar had taken time to submit his proposal.</p></note> yet he is willing to show his readiness in complying with <rs type="person" key="pam">M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Millar</rs>’s request, as he is so desireous of it.<note resp="pi" place="end" xml:id="ftn4" n="4"><p> <hi rend="italic">of it</hi>, i.e., since Becket is eager to comply with it. </p></note> <rs type="person" key="pam">M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Millar</rs> truly knows the faithful &amp; diligent servant he has had in him<note resp="pi" place="end" xml:id="ftn5" n="5"><p> Becket had been Millar’s trusted employee, possibly a shop manager, at least since the birth of his son (named after Millar) in 1749.</p></note> – he also knows the Small income he has had, &amp; what a family to maintain<note resp="pi" place="end" xml:id="ftn6" n="6"><p> At his death in 1813, Becket had one son and four daughters.</p></note> – which he knows has been the cause of his endeavouring to do something more for their advantage.</p>
            <p>In order to make both parties easy &amp; to bring this affair to a final issue,<note resp="pi" place="end" xml:id="ftn7" n="7"><p> <hi rend="italic">to a final issue</hi>, i.e., so that this negotiation can be brought to a close.</p></note> he will totally give up whatever Engagements he has entered into, Provided, <rs type="person" key="pam">M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Millar</rs>, will allow him One Hundred a year for the future, (which he thinks is partly what was promised, or within a trifle) out of which he will pay for the Childrens Education &amp; Board, which will be at least £20.<note resp="pi" place="end" xml:id="ftn8" n="8"><p> These sums place Becket squarely within “the middling ranks”—a growing proportion of London’s population, which by 1760 probably comprised 22% of the total. £100 per year was considered a fair salary for “persons in the law”, “eminent clergymen”, “military officers”, and well-paid tradesmen who were not proprietors. In 1756, Strahan noted that he paid his best employee Archibald Hamilton 30 shillings per week, amounting to £78 per year. Since Hamilton had completed his own apprenticeship in 1749, he could triple his own salary by taking on his own apprentices within Strahan’s shop. See <bibl>K. Wrightson, <hi rend="italic">Earthly Necessities: Economic Lives in Early Modern Britain, 1470–1750 </hi>(New Haven: Yale UP, 2000)</bibl> 288–306; for economic data and social context, see <bibl>P. Mathias, “The Social Structure in the Eighteenth Century: A Calculation by Joseph Massie”, <hi rend="italic">Economic History Review</hi>, n.s. vol. 10 (1957)</bibl> 30–45. </p></note> The Reversion of his Shop to me<note resp="pi" place="end" xml:id="ftn9" n="9"><p> <hi rend="italic">Reversion of his shop to me</hi>, i.e., the promise of succeeding to manage the business at a future date.</p></note> I take very friendly, and depend on <rs type="person" key="pam">M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Millar</rs>’s honour to make good that promise,<note resp="pi" place="end" xml:id="ftn10" n="10"><p> <hi rend="italic">depend on M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Millar’s honour</hi>, i.e., depend on his word alone. Ironically, by putting this in writing, Becket now relies on a written statement rather than Millar’s honesty. </p></note> which he has made to you – whenever it happens <rs type="person" key="pam">M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Millar</rs> shall find in me a most faithfull Steward in regard to every kind of Property he may intrust me with<note resp="pi" place="end" xml:id="ftn11" n="11"><p> <hi rend="italic">Steward</hi>, i.e., principal manager.</p></note> – In the mean time I will do every thing in my power to make Business sit easy on him, and will neglect nothing that I think may advance it in any shape. His absence from it at any time I shall endeavour to fill up in the best manner I can –. The Incumbrances and Expences I have necessarily incurred<note resp="pi" place="end" xml:id="ftn12" n="12"><p> <hi rend="italic">Expenses I have necessarily incurred</hi>: these relate to the “Engagements he has entered into” mentioned earlier.</p></note> I make no doubt <rs type="person" key="pam">M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Millar</rs> will readily take off my hands</p>
            <p>They are as follows. – </p>
            <list type="ordered">
                <item>The House I have 8¾ Years to come by Lease<note resp="pi" place="end" xml:id="ftn13" n="13"><p> <hi rend="italic">House</hi>, i.e., the shop, with the family’s home on the upper floors. Becket is illustrating the greatest of the “non-monetary entitlements” of working as, or for, a successful London merchant: the inclusion of his family’s lodging as an element of his employment. See <bibl>M. J. Daunton, <hi rend="italic">Progress and Poverty: An Economic History of Britain, 1700–1850</hi> (Oxford: Oxford UP, 1995)</bibl> 421–32.</p></note> – the Rent from 1<hi rend="superscript">st</hi> Aug<hi rend="superscript">t</hi> last, to this time, <rs type="person" key="pam">M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Millar</rs> is to pay by Agreem<hi rend="superscript">t</hi> – and expect he will take it off of me from this time. The Rent is about £52 Taxes Included.<note resp="pi" place="end" xml:id="ftn14" n="14"><p> Becket hoped to earn £100 per year (see note 8), so an annual expenditure of 52% on family lodging and shop premises reflects a comparatively comfortable margin of personal income. </p></note></item>
                <item>To pay fitting up the Shop, sign, sign Iron, <unclear reason="initial letter uncertain">Pose</unclear> &amp;c painting Shop, sign &amp;c</item>
                <item>I am to pay for Shop Windows, Shop door, Wainscoat, Paper, Chimny Glass &amp; Picture Marble Chimny piece, Slab, Copper, Jack, Kitchin Grate &amp;c w<hi rend="superscript">c</hi> I take will be by Appraisement about £18– I have paid 2.12.6 for Leases, 1.12.0 for Insuring, and 1.1.0 for Papering.</item>
            </list>
            <pb n="2" facs="scans/228/228b.jpg"/>
            <p>The Shop is a very good one and well situated, and make no doubt but it will soon let, and whoever takes it must pay for the fitting up Painting, kitchin furniture &amp; other expences before mentiond –</p>
            <p>I have been at many expences in Commissioning <rs type="person" key="pdeh">M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Dehondt</rs>s Books, who has sent to<note resp="pi" place="end" xml:id="ftn15" n="15"><p> <hi rend="italic">sent to</hi>, i.e., to whom I have sent.</p></note> near £300 – I dont want to trouble <rs type="person" key="pam">M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Millar</rs> with this at all, only that he will allow me to advertise some of the New ones, which I am in honour bound to do, at my expence, that I may in some measure serve him, who has been very ready to serve me, and repay myself the Charges I have been at, and for the binding which must be £50,<note resp="pi" place="end" xml:id="ftn16" n="16"><p> <hi rend="italic">binding</hi>, i.e., binding the £300 worth of books for sale on behalf of, or in partnership with, De Hondt.</p></note> or more — The overplus <rs type="person" key="pam">M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Millar</rs> shall have to lessen the debt between them.<note resp="pi" place="end" xml:id="ftn17" n="17"><p> Since Millar would be taking on the expenses Becket had incurred by investing in De Hondt’s stock, Millar would receive any profit from trading them. </p></note> I have also rec<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> many Books from Mssr. <rs type="person" key="pfls">Foulis</rs>, <rs type="person" key="pkd">Kincaid</rs>, <rs type="person" key="pahm">Hamilton</rs> &amp; Co.<note resp="pi" place="end" xml:id="ftn18" n="18"><p> Robert (1707–76) and Andrew Foulis (1712–75), prolific printers to the University of Glasgow from 1743, whose famously skilled editions of classical authors and of more recent European and British literature were sold through Millar’s shop. Alexander Kincaid (1710–77) was, like Millar, a former apprentice to James McEuen. He succeeded to his master’s shop in Edinburgh in 1732, and collaborated with Millar on numerous works by Scottish authors. Their collaborations aside, Kincaid and Millar fought numerous legal battles over the rights of Scottish booksellers to print and sell books held under London copyright. Archibald Hamilton (1719–93), Scottish printer and principal manager of Strahan’s shop from 1752 (see note 8), founded his own printing business in Chancery Lane in 1756. Hamilton was a steady commissioner of journalism, history, and fiction by Tobias Smollett.</p></note> all which I will keep to my own Acc<hi rend="superscript">t</hi> if <rs type="person" key="pam">M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Millar</rs> will allow me to sell them, or it shall be at his option to take them at the price they are chargd to me. I shall not trouble <rs type="person" key="pam">M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Millar</rs> with any Wharehouse room for these books as I shall keep them in the Lodgings I may have. I laid out near £20 at <rs type="person" key="psb">M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Baker</rs>’s Sale last month,<note resp="pi" place="end" xml:id="ftn19" n="19"><p>Samuel Baker (1711–78), auctioneer and bookseller, joined Millar as printer and bookseller to the Society for the Encouragement of Learning in 1736. From 1744, Baker popularised retail book auctions to the London public; previously, attendance at book auctions was limited to self-selected members of the trade. On his death, Baker’s auction business passed to his nephew John Sotheby (1740–1807), under whose name it grew into a leading commercial force. In 1804 Sotheby’s firm moved to 145 Strand, next to Cadell and Davies, second-generation successors to Millar. See <bibl><hi rend="italic">A list of the original catalogues of the principal libraries which have been sold by auction by Mr. Samuel Baker, 1744 to 1788 </hi>(London: Compton and Richie, 1828)</bibl>; <bibl>F. Hermann, <hi rend="italic">Sotheby’s: Portrait of an Auction House</hi> (London: Chatto and Windus, 1980)</bibl>; <bibl><hi rend="italic">Gentleman’s Magazine</hi> 48 (1778)</bibl> 190.</p></note> but the books may probably be wanted in time, or I may sell them in some Auction. I have been at Sundry small expences since I have been in the House, but chuse to pass them over rather than trouble <rs type="person" key="pam">M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Millar</rs> with them.</p>
            <p>This is the true &amp; honest State of the case, and I think it the fairest to tell it at once, that <rs type="person" key="pam">M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Millar</rs> may be a judge of it.</p>
            <p>Upon the Conditions above mentiond I will chearfully serve him — I will devout my whole time to his Service – and will do all I can for his Interest — On the other hand, I desire <rs type="person" key="pam">M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Millar</rs> will give it as chearfully as I may receive it; if not, I beg it as a favour he will totally decline it – on which I will immediately follow the Plan Intended, &amp; embrace the opportunity this Shop &amp; Situation may afford me, which, with the assistance of some friends &amp; the advantages that may accrue from the books in my possession, I make no doubt of doing very well – even in this case <rs type="person" key="pam">M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Millar</rs> may depend on my doing him any Services he may please to ask of me.</p>
            <p>
                <span rend="padding-left:10em;"><rs type="person" key="ptb">Tho<hi rend="superscript">s</hi>Becket</rs></span><lb/>
                <span rend="padding-left:5em;">Tuesday 25<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> Decb<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> 1759</span>
            </p>
        </body>
    </text>
</TEI>
